Problems with physics shape
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:01 am
Hi,
This is driving bonkers for some time now
Object: Floor in U shape for a theater
https://gyazo.com/3c66fee020e47fded6dbe272740aa7e7
Number of tris: 25
Number of tris of Physics shape: 15, the verts go till the most extreme edges on the <x,y,z> axis. as should be to get the floor working perfect.
I brought this element in second life, set to prim, no problem at all, physics works perfect and behaves as should do.
One small face is going in the z-axis direction to give it some thickness, if not, one can not reduce the size due to limitation of the minimum distance rule.
Problem: The physics shape is made as always, matching extreme verts and all, brought in via two systems. Physics analysed and not analysed. I know by experience that for some U-shapes and most closed forms it is better to analyse or it want work.
Picture with visual physics
https://gyazo.com/986ef98ccfdde6234e05e80f096672ed
First time I tested it worked, I do a second test to see if all is OK and for whatever reason I fell through on several places. Why did it the first time work, no relogging, no replacement of the object, no nothing. Form then on nothing but problems
Analyse or no analyse didn't make a difference.
I noticed a similar problem end August, early September with some door frames (again U-shape). In between nothing with this kind of shape has been made.
Is this some influence of the physics setting of the land (setting ODE), anybody any idea?
Thanks in advance for eventual replies,
Cheers,
Zed
This is driving bonkers for some time now
Object: Floor in U shape for a theater
https://gyazo.com/3c66fee020e47fded6dbe272740aa7e7
Number of tris: 25
Number of tris of Physics shape: 15, the verts go till the most extreme edges on the <x,y,z> axis. as should be to get the floor working perfect.
I brought this element in second life, set to prim, no problem at all, physics works perfect and behaves as should do.
One small face is going in the z-axis direction to give it some thickness, if not, one can not reduce the size due to limitation of the minimum distance rule.
Problem: The physics shape is made as always, matching extreme verts and all, brought in via two systems. Physics analysed and not analysed. I know by experience that for some U-shapes and most closed forms it is better to analyse or it want work.
Picture with visual physics
https://gyazo.com/986ef98ccfdde6234e05e80f096672ed
First time I tested it worked, I do a second test to see if all is OK and for whatever reason I fell through on several places. Why did it the first time work, no relogging, no replacement of the object, no nothing. Form then on nothing but problems
Analyse or no analyse didn't make a difference.
I noticed a similar problem end August, early September with some door frames (again U-shape). In between nothing with this kind of shape has been made.
Is this some influence of the physics setting of the land (setting ODE), anybody any idea?
Thanks in advance for eventual replies,
Cheers,
Zed