Prim size limits; placement limits

Ask questions about creating worlds, using worlds, etc.
Post Reply
Dot Macchi
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:15 pm
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Prim size limits; placement limits

Post by Dot Macchi »

I have been able to resize prims to 256m in the past, but the limit seems to have changed to 64m just recently -- in both Firestorm and (unexpectedly) in Imprudence.

Another question from building in an advanced megaregion (2x2 in this case): I'm trying to use build-maths to type in numbers to shift a wrongly placed object from one region to the corresponding spot in another -- so changing the x value from 42 to 42+256, say. What happens is that the object simply moves to x = 256, not beyond to x = 298. Is this expected behaviour? (This is in Imprudence.)

Thanks, as ever, for your help.
User avatar
Ilan Tochner
Posts: 6504
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:44 am
Has thanked: 4943 times
Been thanked: 4455 times
Contact:

Re: Prim size limits; placement limits

Post by Ilan Tochner »

Hi Dot,

Both the problems you reported are regressions in the new Firestorm version which have been fixed and should be resolved once the next version of Firestorm for OpenSim comes out, see:

http://jira.phoenixviewer.com/browse/FIRE-8417
http://jira.phoenixviewer.com/browse/FIRE-8467

As for Imprudence, what version of that viewer are you encountering the 64m limit on?
Dot Macchi
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:15 pm
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Prim size limits; placement limits

Post by Dot Macchi »

The Mac version of Imprudence 1.4.0 beta 1.

=====================
Edit: My apologies -- In Imprudence (freshly downloaded) I hadn't disabled the build constraints (Advanced > tick Disable Max Build Constraints). :oops:

My 256x256m sky platforms are now possible.
User avatar
Ilan Tochner
Posts: 6504
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:44 am
Has thanked: 4943 times
Been thanked: 4455 times
Contact:

Re: Prim size limits; placement limits

Post by Ilan Tochner »

Hi Dot,

I'm glad to hear the mystery has been solved :-)
Post Reply